Exclude table from transaction log

Hi
Does anyone know if it is possible that changes to a specific table are not
recorded in the transaction log while changes to other tables are ?
If yes how can this be done?
Thanks
Daniel
Message posted via http://www.droptable.comThat's not possible. Why do you want to do this?
Tom
----
Thomas A. Moreau, BSc, PhD, MCSE, MCDBA
SQL Server MVP
Toronto, ON Canada
"DANR via droptable.com" <u26179@.uwe> wrote in message
news:662d81586fb67@.uwe...
Hi
Does anyone know if it is possible that changes to a specific table are not
recorded in the transaction log while changes to other tables are ?
If yes how can this be done?
Thanks
Daniel
Message posted via http://www.droptable.com|||Hi,
No. We can not do that. SQL Server engine by itself will log all the
transactions in to transaction log file.
Thanks
Hari
SQL Server MVP
"DANR via droptable.com" <u26179@.uwe> wrote in message
news:662d81586fb67@.uwe...
> Hi
> Does anyone know if it is possible that changes to a specific table are
> not
> recorded in the transaction log while changes to other tables are ?
> If yes how can this be done?
> Thanks
> Daniel
> --
> Message posted via http://www.droptable.com
>|||Hi Tom
Because I have a table were I register several informations with thousands o
f
records but the information is not really critical and if something goes
wrong I don't need to recover that information.
This information is increasing the size of the transaction log without being
really necessary.
Thanks
Daniel
Tom Moreau wrote:
>That's not possible. Why do you want to do this?
>Hi
>Does anyone know if it is possible that changes to a specific table are not
>recorded in the transaction log while changes to other tables are ?
>If yes how can this be done?
>Thanks
>Daniel
Message posted via http://www.droptable.com|||Ok Hari
Thanks
Daniel
Hari Prasad wrote:[vbcol=seagreen]
>Hi,
>No. We can not do that. SQL Server engine by itself will log all the
>transactions in to transaction log file.
>Thanks
>Hari
>SQL Server MVP
>
>[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
Message posted via droptable.com
http://www.droptable.com/Uwe/Forum...server/200609/1|||If you don't need that this table is time-correlated with the rest of the ta
ble in your backups,
consider putting it in its own database. Also, this database can be in simpl
e recovery mode and you
can investigate if it is possible to input the data using a minimally logged
operation (bulk loading
is probably the best bet).
Tibor Karaszi, SQL Server MVP
http://www.karaszi.com/sqlserver/default.asp
http://www.solidqualitylearning.com/
"DANR via droptable.com" <u26179@.uwe> wrote in message news:662ee8ef93f81@.uwe...reen">
> Hi Tom
> Because I have a table were I register several informations with thousands
of
> records but the information is not really critical and if something goes
> wrong I don't need to recover that information.
> This information is increasing the size of the transaction log without bei
ng
> really necessary.
> Thanks
> Daniel
>
> Tom Moreau wrote:
> --
> Message posted via http://www.droptable.com
>|||Hi Tibor
Thanks for your sugestion. I already thought using that approach.
I just asked because maybe someone know other way.
Thanks to all
Regards
Daniel
Tibor Karaszi wrote:[vbcol=seagreen]
>If you don't need that this table is time-correlated with the rest of the t
able in your backups,
>consider putting it in its own database. Also, this database can be in simp
le recovery mode and you
>can investigate if it is possible to input the data using a minimally logge
d operation (bulk loading
>is probably the best bet).
>
>[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
Message posted via http://www.droptable.com